消費資訊公開法制之建構
555
from the perspective of the judgment C-636/11 of the European
Court of Justice.
Soochow Law Journal
, 26, 2: 35-66.
)
李寧修
(
2015
)。〈歐盟食品法制之基本原則及其實踐：由歐盟第
178/2002
號規則出發〉，洪德欽、陳淳文
(編)，《歐盟法之基
礎原則與實務發展
(下)》，頁
247-290
。臺北：臺大出版中心。
(
Lee, N.-H. [2015]. General principles and practices of European
Union food law: Setting off from regulation [EC] no. 178/2002.
In D.-C. Horng & C.-W. Chen [Eds.],
The EU law
—
Principles
and practices II
[pp. 247-290]. Taipei: National Taiwan Univer-
sity Press.
)
李震山
(
2002
)。〈論憲法意義下之「資訊權」〉，翁岳生教授祝壽論
文集編輯委員會
(編)，《當代公法新論
(上)：翁岳生教授七秩誕
辰祝壽論文集》，頁
71-83
。臺北：元照。(
Li C.-S. [2002]. The
constitutional meaning of “right to information.” In Editorial
board of festschrift in honor of Prof. Dr. Yueh-sheng Weng
’
s
birthday
[Ed.],
Modern theories of public law revisited
—
Festschrift
in honor of Prof. Dr. Yueh-sheng Weng’s 70th birthday
[Vol. 1, pp.
71-83]. Taipei: Angle.
)
李震山
(
2005
)。〈來者猶可追，正視個人資料保護問題——司法院大
法官釋字第
603
號解釋評析〉，《台灣本土法學雜誌》，
76:
222-234
。(
Li, C.-S. [2005]. The future may still be provided
against, facing the issue of personal information protection
—
Analysis of the Judicial Yuan interpretation no. 603.
Taiwan Law
Journal
, 76: 222-234.
)
李震山
(
2007
)。〈資訊權——兼論監視錄影器設置之法律問題〉，《多
元、寬容與人權保障：以憲法未列舉權之保障為中心》(二版)，
頁
193-260
。臺北：元照。(
Li, C.-S. [2007]. The right to in-
formation
—
Discussing the legal issue in the establishment of
surveillance camera. In
Plurality, tolerance, and the protection of
human rights
—
Focusing on the protection of non-enumerated
rights
[2nd ed., pp. 193-260]. Taipei: Angle.
)
李震山
(
2011
)。〈論資訊自決權〉，《人性尊嚴與人權保障》(
4
版)，
頁
219-271
。臺北：元照。(
Li, C.-S. [2011]. The right to in-
formational self-determination on personal data. In
Human dig-
