554
歐美研究
參考文獻
吳綺雲
(譯)
(
2004
)。〈警告葡萄酒摻乙二醇案判決〉，司法院
(編)，
《德國聯邦憲法法院裁判選輯》(第
11
輯)，頁
169-187
。臺北：
司法院。(
Wu, C.-Y. [Trans.]. [2004]. The judgment of “wine
mixed with polyethylene glycol warning case.” In J. Yuan [Ed.],
Selection of the judgments of German Federal Constitutional
Court
[Vol. 11, pp. 169-187]. Taipei: Judicial Yuan.
)
李惠宗
(
2009
)。《憲法要義》(
5
版)。臺北：元照。(
Li, H.-T. [2009].
The essence of the Constitution
[
5th ed.]. Taipei: Angle.
)
李惠宗
(
2010
)。〈政府資訊公開法上的請求權——台中高等行政法院
96
年度訴字第
495
號判決評析〉，《月旦裁判時報》，
1: 11-17
。
(
Li, H.-T. [2010]. The claim based on the freedom of govern-
ment information law
—
Analysis of 96 Su 495 of Taichung High
Administrative Court.
Court Case Times
, 1: 11-17.
)
李寧修
(
2012
)。〈從憲法觀點論消費資訊公開請求權〉，《憲政時代》，
38, 2: 215-244
。(
Lee, N.-H. [2012]. A study on the right of
access to consumer information from the constitutional aspect.
Constitutional Review
, 38, 2: 215-244.
)
李寧修
(
2013
)。〈論歐盟及德國食品安全法制與其通報系統之建構〉，
《興大法學》，
13: 1-46
。(
Lee, N.-H. [2013]. Discussion of legal
contents and the construction of food safety alert system in EU
and Germany.
Chung-Hsing University Law Review
, 13: 1-46.
)
李寧修
(
2014a
)。〈反客為主的豁免政府資訊公開條款？／最高行
102
判
716
判決〉，《台灣法學雜誌》，
248: 179-185
。(
Lee, N.-H.
[2014a]. Gaining the initiative by exempting the freedom of
government information clause? Analysis of 102 Pan 716 of the
Supreme Administrative Court.
Taiwan Law Journal
, 248:
179-185.
)
李寧修
(
2014b
)。〈行政機關主動公開消費資訊之法制與實踐：由歐
洲法院
C-636/11
判決檢視我國消費資訊公開法制〉，《東吳法
律學報》，
26, 2: 35-66
。(
Lee, N.-H. [2014b]. Laws and practices
of authority’s voluntary publication of consumer information
—
Examination of consumer information publication law in Taiwan
