司法互助是公平審判的化外之地?
563
245-255.
)
邱鼎文
(
2012a
)。〈經由司法互助取得證據之證據能力──以澳門擄人
勒贖案之評釋為中心〉,《檢察新論》,
12: 74-86
。(
Chiu, T. W.
[2012a]. The admissibility of evidences obtained by legal mutual
assistance
─
A comparative study on review of Macao kidnap-
pings for ransom case.
Taiwan Prosecutor Review
, 12: 74-86.
)
邱鼎文
(
2012b
)。《論經由司法互助取得證據之證據能力──以傳聞
法則與排除法則為中心》。臺中:東海大學法律學院法律學研究
所碩士論文。(
Chiu, T. W. [2012b].
The admissibility of evidences
obtained by legal mutual assistance
─
A comparative study on the
hearsay rule and exclusionary rule
. Unpublished master thesis,
Department of Law, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.
)
范振中
(
2012
)。〈兩岸司法互助──以
98
年「兩岸協議」為探討〉,
《司法新聲》,
103: 95-107
。(
Fan, C. C. [2012]. Cross-strait
mutual legal assistance
─
The discussion of “Cross-Strait Joint
Fight against Crime and Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement” in
2009.
Judicial Aspirations
, 103: 95-107.
)
張熙懷、葉建廷
(
2003
)。〈我國傳聞法則之例外規定:特信性文書〉,
《傳聞法則:理論與實踐》,頁
199-253
。臺北:元照。(
Chang,
H. H., & Yeh, C. T. [2003]. Exceptions of the hearsay rule in
local law: Special credibility document. In
Theory and practice of
hearsay rule
[pp. 199-253]. Taipei: Angle.
)
許玉秀等
(
2014
年
5
月)。「來自星星的證人──對質詰問、證物提示
與死刑裁判:以杜氏兄弟案為例學術研討會」論文。臺北:臺灣
大學刑事法中心等。(
Hsu, Y. H., et al. [2014, May].
Witnesses
from stars
─
Cross-examination, exhibits’ presentation and death
penalty judgments: The case of the Du brothers
. Paper presented
at the conference of the
Center of Criminal Justice in National
Taiwan University on Witnesses from Stars, Taipei.
)
許玉秀、陳欽賢、李佳玟、賴中強、林鈺雄、朱家安
(
2014
)。〈來自
星星的證人──對質詰問、證物提示與死刑裁判:以杜氏兄弟案
為例〉,《司法改革雜誌》,
102: 11-31
。(
Hsu, Y. H., Chen, C.
S., Lee, C.-W., Lai, C.-c., Lin, Y.-H., & Chu, J. A. [2014]. Wit-
nesses From Stars: Cross-examination, exhibits’ presentation and