564 / 774
564
歐美研究
death penalty judgments
─
The case of the Du brothers.
Judicial
Reform Review
, 102: 11-31.
)
陳運財
(
2003
)。〈傳聞法則之理論及其實踐〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，
97: 85-106
。(
Chen, Y. T. [2003]. Theory of hearsay rule and its
practice.
Taiwan Law Review
, 97: 85-106.
)
曾淑瑜
(
2011
)。〈評析「海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議」刑
事司法合作之模式〉，《輔仁法學》，
41: 75-127
。(
Tseng, S. Y.
[2011]. To comment on the patterns of criminal judicial
co-operation in “Cross-strait joint fight against crime and mutual
legal assistance agreement.”
Fu Jen Law Review
, 41: 75-127.
)
楊雲驊
(
2013
年
10
月)。〈國際刑事司法互助取得證據之證據能力判
斷〉，「國際刑事司法互助的趨勢學術研討會」論文。臺北：法
務部國際及兩岸法律事務司。(
Yang, Y. H. [2013, October].
Ev-
idence qualifications from international cooperation for taking
evidence
. Paper presented at the conference of the Department
of International and Cross-strait Legal Affairs of the Ministry of
Justice on Trends of International Legal Mutual Assistance in
Criminal Matters, Taipei.
)
慶啟人
(
2004a
)。〈試論臺灣如何與他國進行實質之司法合作
1
〉，《法
務通訊》，
2201: 4-5
。(
Qing, Q. R. [2004a]. How can Taiwan
enter into substantial judicial cooperations with other countries
1.
Legal Affairs Newsletter
, 2201: 4-5.
)
慶啟人
(
2004b
)。〈試論臺灣如何與他國進行實質之司法合作
2
〉，《法
務通訊》，
2202: 3-5
。(
Qing, Q. R. [2004b]. How can Taiwan
enter into substantial judicial cooperations with other countries
2.
Legal Affairs Newsletter
, 2202: 3-5.
)
賴中強
(
2014
)。〈未生效卻先行的兩岸司法互助協議〉，《司法改革
雜誌》，
102: 21-23
。(
Lai, C. C. [2014]. Cross-strait joint fight
against crime and mutual legal assistance agreement is imple-
mented before it becomes effective.
Judicial Reform Review
, 102:
21-23.
)
賴志豪
(
2004
)。〈人權法之新開展──論
Soering
案對引渡法之影
響〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，
108: 94-110
。(
Lai, C. H. [2004]. New
developments of Human Rights Law
—
The impact of Soering