Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  100 / 148 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 100 / 148 Next Page
Page Background

100

歐美研究

李震山

(

2000

)。《人性尊嚴與人權保障》。臺北:元照。(

Li, C. S. [2000].

Human dignity and protection of human rights

. Taipei: Angle.

)

林鈺雄

(

2008

)。〈論通訊之監察——評析歐洲人權法院相關裁判之發

展與影響〉,《東吳法律學報》,

19, 4: 109-152

。(

Lin, Y. H. [2008].

Interception of communications

Critiques on judgments of

European Court of Human Rights.

Soochow Law Review

, 19, 4:

109-152.

)

林鈺雄

(

2013

)。〈通訊監察之修法芻議——通訊保障及監察法之部分

修正條文〉,《萬國法律》,

192: 25-39

。(

Lin, Y. H. [2013]. On

the amendment to the Law of Surveillance: Selected amended

provisions of the Communication Security and Surveillance Act.

FT Law Review

, 192: 25-39.

)

林鈺雄

(

2014

)。〈法官保留原則與干預處分專庭——以通訊監察之修

法芻議為例〉,《月旦法學教室》,

136: 55-65

。(

Lin, Y. H. [2014].

The principle of exclusive authority of judges and the specialized

court for compulsory measures: On the amendment to the Law

of Surveillance.

Taiwan Jurist

, 136: 55-65.

)

范姜真媺

(

2016

)。〈網路時代個人資料保護之強化——被遺忘權利之

主張〉,《興大法學》,

19: 61-106

。(

Fan Chiang, C. M. [2016].

The enforcement of protection of personal data in internet era:

The claim of the right to be forgotten.

Chung-Hsing University

Law Review

, 19: 61-106.

)

翁逸泓、廖福特

(

2014

)。《私生活之權利——探索歐洲,反思臺灣》。

臺北:新學林。(

Weng, W. Y. H., & Liao, F. F. T. [2014].

The right

to private life: Reflections on Taiwan through the inquiry into

Europe

. Taipei: New Sharing.

)

陳妍婷

(

2014

)。《通訊監察「相關性原則」之探討》。臺中:東海大

學法律學研究所碩士論文。(

Chen, Y. T. [2014].

A study on the

relevance requirement in the Communication Protection and

Surveillance Act

. Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Law,

Tunghai University, Taichung.

)

許炳華

(

2015

)。〈被遺忘的權利:比較法之觀察〉,《東吳法律學報》,

27, 1: 125-163

。(

Hsu, P. H. [2015]. Right to be forgotten: Ob-

servations from the perspectives of comparative law.

Soochow