歐美研究季刊第48卷第1期

189 / 200

從歐盟會員國憲政危機檢討哥本哈根政治標準執行上之缺失 189
of law. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law Inter-
national.
Kolarska-Bobińska, L. (2003). The EU accession and strengthening of
institutions in East Central Europe: The case of Poland. East Eu-
ropean Politics and Societies, 17, 1: 91-98.
Koncewicz, T. T. (2017). Farewell to the separation of powers: On the
judicial purge and the capture in the heart of Europe. Retrieved
Levitz, P., & Pop-Eleches, G. (2010). Why no backsliding? The Euro-
pean Union’s impact on democracy and governance before and
after accession. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 4: 457-485.
Nechev, Z., Mesarek, G. V., Saranovich, N. B., & Nikolov, A. (2013).
Embedding rule of law in the enlargement process: A case for EU
political conditionality in the accession of the western Balkan
countries. Retrieved from
Nozar, W. (2012). The 100% union: The rise of chapters 23 and 24.
Retrieved from
Ott, A. (2005). The “principle” of differentiation in an enlarged Euro-
pean Union: Unity in diversity? In K. Inglis & A. Ott (Eds.), The
Constitution for Europe and an enlarging Union: Unity in diversity?
(pp. 104-133). Groningen, the Netherlands: Europa Law.
Paris Conference on Stability in Europe. (1995). Political declaration
adopted at the conclusion of the final Conference on the Pact on
Stability in Europe and list of good-neighbourliness and coopera-
tion agreements and arrangements. Bulletin of the European Un-
ion, 3: 112-116.
Pop-Eleches, G. (2007). Between historical legacies and the promise of
Western integration: Democratic conditionality after Com-
munism. East European Politics and Societies, 21, 1: 142-161.
Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J. A. (2013). Associated with the past?