714 歐美研究 Resolution Act from the perspective of patient safety risk managment [Vol. 1]. Angle Health Law Review, 20: 144-168.) https://doi. org/10.3966/241553062018060020013 梁志鳴 (2019)。〈論跨領域法律解釋適用之原則與挑戰──以美國在 地慣習與全國水準之辯證及我國醫療常規與醫療水準之論戰為 例〉，《中研院法學期刊》，24: 255-361。https://publication. iias.sinica.edu.tw/52712181.pdf (Liang, C.-M. [2019]. Theorizing interdisciplinary legal interpretation and application with sociological theories: Debates between local customs and national standard in the U.S. and between medical norm and medical standard in Taiwan as examples. Academia Sinica Law Journal, 24: 255-361.) 郭淑媛 (2015年5月14日)。〈醫療糾紛立法 醫界為何大反彈？〉， 《今週刊》。https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/ (Guo, S.-Y. [2015, May 14]. Legislating medical dispute: Why the medical community fight back? Business Today.) 黃茗 (2017)。〈借鏡日本醫療紛爭訴訟外調解解決之經驗，看我國醫 療糾紛調解可發展方向〉，《仲裁》，105: 98-122。(Huang, M. [2017]. The future direction of medical dispute mediation in Taiwan: Japanese application of ADR in medical dispute as a reference point. Arbitration, 105: 98-122.) 黃鈺媖 (2014)。《美國道歉制度沿革及啟示──告別對立走向對話》。 元照。(Huang, Y.-Y. [2014]. The history and lessons of apology law in the US: Moving from confrontation to dialogue. Angle.) 黃鈺媖、楊秀儀 (2015)。〈病人為何要告醫生？以糾紛發動者為中心 之法實證研究〉，《國立臺灣大學法學論叢》，44, 4: 1845-1885。 (Huang, Y.-Y., & Yang, H.-I. [2015]. Why do people sue doctors? An empirical legal study from the perspectives of patients and their families. National Taiwan University Law Journal, 44, 4: 1845-1885.) https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2015.44.04.04 楊秀儀 (2000)。〈從無過失重回過失：紐西蘭有關醫療傷害補償制度 之變遷及對臺灣之啟示〉，《政大法學評論》，64: 97-119。(Yang, H.-I. [2000]. A return to fault: The New Zealand lesson for
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODg3MDU=