歐美研究第五十二卷第四期

解消「物種問題」 651 science (pp. 8-28). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-0-230-29719-7_2 Saatsi, J. T. (2017). Replacing recipe realism. Synthese, 194, 9: 32333244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0962-3 Shapiro, B. (2015). How to clone a mammoth: The science of de-extinction. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt 1287kp1 Slater, M. H. (2013). Are species real? An essay on the metaphysics of species. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393 233 Sneath, P. H., & Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. W. H. Freeman. Sober, E. (1980). Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism. Philosophy of Science, 47, 3: 350-383. https://doi.org/10.1086/288942 Sober, E. (1993). Philosophy of biology. Westview Press. Sokal, R. R., & Sneath, P. H. (1963). Principles of numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman. Stanford, P. K. (1995). For pluralism and against realism about species. Philosophy of Science, 62, 1: 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 289840 Stanford, P. K. (2006). Exceeding our grasp: Science, history, and the problem of unconceived alternatives. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195174089.001.0001 Turner, D. D. (2004). The past vs. the tiny: Historical science and the abductive arguments for realism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35, 1: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2003.12. 012 van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198244274.001.0001 van Inwagen, P. (2015). Metaphysics. Westview press. https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9780429495021 van Valen, L. (1976). Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon, 25, 2/3: 233-239. https://doi.org/10.2307/1219444

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODg3MDU=