論美國法精神障礙抗辯的新發展 561 李念祖 (2020)。〈社會嚴譴殺警案無罪判決的文化原因〉，《台灣法 學雜誌》，392: 1-6。(Li, N.-T. [2020]. Cultural reasons for the acquittal of the police murder case. Taiwan Law Journal, 392: 1-6.) 吳忻穎、林晉佑 (2020)。〈責任能力調查與監護處分執行現況之探 討〉，《矯政期刊》，9, 1: 71-107。(Wu, H.-Y., & Lin, C.-Y. [2020]. Exploring the present situation about investigating criminal responsibility and the enforcement of rehabilitative measures. Journal of Corrections, 9, 1: 71-107.) https://doi.org/10.6905/ JC.202001_9(1).0003 法思齊 (2016)。〈割喉魔之審判──精神障礙與死刑〉，《月旦法學 教室》，167: 56-64。(Fa, S.-C. [2016]. Trial of the cutthroat demon: Mental disorders and the death penalty. Taiwan Jurist, 167: 56-64.) https://doi.org/10.3966/168473932016090167011 周函諒 (2020)。〈正當法律程序的司法控制與回應——以人身自由為 中心〉，《軍法專刊》，66, 2: 123-143。(Chou, H.-L. [2020]. Due process of law and dynamic judicial response: A focus on the issues of personal freedom. The Military Law Journal, 66, 2: 123-143.) 林山田 (2008) 。《刑法通論 (上冊)》。元照。(Lin, S.-T. [2008]. Criminal Law: General principles [Vol. 1]. Angel.) 林志潔 (2009)。〈論美國法上犯罪主觀要件與精神障礙心智缺陷抗 辯》：Clark v. Arizona 案之判決評析〉，《歐美研究》，39, 4: 615-670。(Lin, C.-C. [2009]. Mens rea and insanity defense under U.S. law—An analysis of Clark v. Arizona. EurAmerica, 39, 4: 615670.) 林孟潔 (2020年9月30日)。〈吸毒弒母判無罪 11天火速發回〉， 《聯合新聞網》。https://udn.com/news/story/7315/4899090 (Lin, M.-J. [2020, September 30]. Drug addict found not guilty of murdering his mother; 11 days to remand for re-trial. udn.com.) 林家伃 (2019)。《醉態抗辯與原因自由行為——借鏡美國法觀點》， 國立政治大學法律學系碩士班碩士論文。(Lin, C.-Y. [2019]. A study on intoxication defense and actio libera in causa: A lesson from the United States. National ChengChi University Master Thesis.) 林書楷 (2020) 。《刑法總則》。五南。(Lin, S.-K. [2020]. Criminal Law:
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODg3MDU=